Wisconsin, The first rebel in the USA : Figure 2 & 3
The China Syndrome : Figure 5 & 6
Virus Mutations : Figure 1
CHAPTER 5. Opportunity leads to conspiracy .
Since there are a lot of different CT’s from very different sources; it’s obvious they can’t all be true, and it’s difficult to discriminate right from wrong since the so called “Fact-Checkers” from the Main Stream Media are in fact dictated what news facts to accept and what facts to reject.
Because of the lockdown and social distancing measures, some slick businessmen saw the opportunity to make a lot of money within a short time. A lot of small companies tried to fill in quickly the new gaps like the increasing demand of transparent shielding’s, floor sign marks, face masks, alcoholic gels, take-away food etc…
However, when big companies make abnormal huge profit due to the corona crisis, for e.g. delivery services like amazon, Alibaba, bol.com… a conspiracy theory is quickly suggested1. Other business that are not directly related to corona as such, took advantage of the situation for e.g. quickly rolling out 5G, discouraging the use of cash money etc… became therefore also quickly suspected to be part of the conspiracy.
The most trustworthy and logical CT is obviously the huge vaccination business. It’s so obvious and “natural” that it doesn’t feel like a CT.
Of course, the first year the vaccines will be sold relatively cheap (since a lot of governments have been willing to pay quite a lot in advance), but do you really believe it will stay that way?
A fact is that due to the mutational behavior of the RNA viruses (to which both the Corona and Flu viruses belong); we will end up quite soon with seasonal corona epidemics (smaller than the pandemic we face now, but “considerable” high enough to persuade much more people to have them vaccinated against it on a yearly basis, just like the flu-vaccines, but more profitable).
Even if this whole pandemic charade would not be related to any CT at all, it was a damn good exercise to see how far one can go to establish a worldwide dictatorial regime.
A viral pandemic proved a useful tool to do so; no one can see viruses, they’re so small you need an electron microscope to visualize them. Thus simply based on some extreme images of seriously ill people and some stultifying mantra’s such as “wear your face mask” or “keep your social distance” like in a cheap SF-movie, people start to obey in a servile way all the rules.
Moreover, the fact that you’ve got the power to forbid people to come together for debating, protesting and organizing themselves, you can easily dominate the whole world by spreading fear faster than any virus can spread itself (thanks to our 5G network).
However, the longer these dictatorial corona measures are kept in place, and the more we evolve into a controlled snitching society like the STASI2 used to do in the DDR, the more reasons we have to believe there is really something bigger going on than just a badly managed viral pandemic.
If you’re convinced that the Corona pandemic is just a small part from a much bigger sinister plan, dive into Agenda 213 or into some sinister characters like Klaus Schwab4 but wait at least 3 hours after finishing your meal or you might throw up.
References:
1 Billionares keep on profiting from Pandemic :Critics must be silenced for billionaires to keep profiting from pandemic | Opinion | LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)
2 STASI (DDR): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stasi
3 Agenda 21: Agenda 21/2030 is the New World Order – Real Truth Real News (wordpress.com)
4 Klaus Schwab: https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/12/klaus-schwab-his-great-fascist-reset/
CHAPTER 4. Where Sweden borders Wisconsin.
Prof. Dr. Johan Giesecke shares some more of his insights: Johan Giesecke – Wikipedia
Sweden showed the world intellectual self-confidence. Instead of eagerly going into a state of emergency, they did not stop flights or close borders, and they kept normal city life. They recommended social distancing, and for those over 70 of age to stay in self-quarantine. They treated adults as grown-ups with their health being at least partially their own responsibility.
They prohibited public events from 50 people on, but when it should happen spontaneously, police cannot stop people and ask them a justification, no fines were given. As a nation, they show common sense and individual responsibility, and a strong tendency to follow recommendations, something which cannot be expected when people have no confidence in their political leaders.
Administrative independence allows less room for arbitrary decisions, and no overruling by politicians, who do things for other than scientific reasons.
Sweden valued the Hippocratic oath, do no harm. With no expected better health outcome, a lockdown makes all sectors related to export suffering tremendously. For the health of the social security in the long run domestic economy must thrive. Where many other countries that went in a severe lockdown have built up a huge debt, Sweden is one of the few nations that did not made a terrible loss on their Gross National Product.
Sweden has decided that they can’t defeat the disease by killing the patient.
Most people who died in Sweden were close to Sweden’s average life expectancy, and there was little excess mortality. So, most should have died anyway, but there was always attending enough health professionals, unlike in ‘fascist’ countries that put people aside to die. Is that protecting the vulnerable?
Restricting freedom might be useful during pandemics but only when there are good reasons to assume that this will help in the long term. Those reasons are not there, at least not with this virus, which is not too horrible, aka a combo contagiousness and mortality. You cannot play hide-and-seek with this virus; you must confront it. Lockdowns hurt societies without any health benefit.
What did flatten the curve in Sweden were no lock-down was imposed ?
Prof. Dr. Johan Giesecke :
First immunity, and the other is that the people who are frail and old will die first and when that group of people is sort of thinned out you will get less deaths. That’s why the old and vulnerable people needed to be taken extra care of, not the rest of the healthy people. It is hard to ascertain that this category of people was usually not protected at all, which explains the high numbers of victims in the rest homes.
The flattening of the curve is due to the most vulnerable dying first, the results will eventually be similar for all countries. Covid-19 is a mild disease, similar like the flu and only deadly for certain high-risk patients that already suffered from heart-lung disease and/or impaired immunity.
It was just the novelty of the disease that scared people. The actual fatality rate of Covid-19 is in the region of 0.1%, and at least 50% of the population of both the UK and Sweden will be shown to have already had the disease when mass antibody testing becomes available.
The more we hear experts like this, the more the official narrative and actions seem blatantly counter-productive.
What has happened to our politicians, and our media? When will an interviewer ask intelligent questions again? And react to what the interviewee said, when deciding the next Q to pose, instead of following the direction of an editor in their earpiece.
‘Countries that start their exit strategy will have some other deaths that we had already. As the disease passes through the population, are we gonna see second and third spikes?
The increasing number of deaths will be part of checking which strategy should be kept temporally and which could be loosened.
When I first heard about the different draconic measures that were taken, I asked myself how are they going to climb down from that? When will they open the schools again, and what should be the criterion to open schools? Did anyone of those seemingly strong and very decisive politicians think about how to get out of this when they introduced it?
In one thing that most governments were honest and correct regarding the measures that have been taken, was the fact they stated that it was much easier to impose a sudden lock down than to re-open everything gradually in function of the “needs” and “risks”.
It’s difficult of course for the authorities to admit now that all those severe lockdown and quarantine measures, they’ve imposed were ‘exaggerated’ and were not really needed; they would lose face too much and even so their credibility among their voters.’
I think that the difference between countries would be quite small in the end so that you don’t think that the severity of these intervening measures are gonna make that much difference
I think what we’re seeing is a tsunami which is sweeping over Europe and some countries do this and some countries do that, and, in the end, there will be very little difference.
This virus is usually quite mild, most people who get it will never even notice they were infected.
The actual fatality rate of this diseases is much lower than the numbers that have been talked about, much much lower!
I think it would be like a severe influenza season, in an order of 0.1 to 0.5 percent maximum.
The whole sort of rationale for introducing these lockdowns across Europe that has created such unbelievable side-effects, and pretty much stops the whole world in its tracks, is a misguided policy that’s doing more harm than good.
Theoretically you could say that the very weakest people who would die in a few months are dying now if there is no lockdown, and if they are not protected. The correct policy from the start should have been to shield old and vulnerable groups. Then we wouldn’t have to deal with the effects of the lockdown…
One major result is the dictatorial trends which pop up in more established democracies.
Although there is an enormous amount of public support for it, it is still potentially dangerous if they take away constitutional rights. A new disease, with a lot of people that seem to be dying from it, you don’t know really what will happen. This fear of contagion demands political strength and decisiveness. But do you think you could keep the lockdown and protecting the old people until we have good drugs and good vaccines six months, a year, 18 months from now? I think people would get a bit tired of it, even if they support the policy.
I think it will be like a severe influenza. When the flu comes, we all say oh, the flu is coming like every winter. It usually kills in this country around up to 2,000 people, but it’s normal, its influenza, we have it every year. And they’re old and they’re going to die soon anyway, so no one is very upset about influenza. But corona? Hell no!
The Swedish laws on communicable diseases are mostly based on voluntary measures, or individual responsibility. It clearly states that the citizen has the responsibility not to spread a disease. This is the core we started from, because there is not much legal possibility to close down cities in Sweden using the present laws. Quarantine can be contemplated for people or small areas, such as a school or a hotel. But [legally] we cannot lock down a geographical area.
It is difficult to talk about the scientific basis of a strategy with these types of disease, because we do not know much about it and we are learning as we are doing, day by day. Closedown, lockdown, closing borders — nothing has a historical scientific basis, in my view. We have looked at several European Union countries to see whether they have published any analysis of the effects of these measures before they were started, and we saw almost none.
Closing borders, in my opinion, is ridiculous, because COVID-19 is in every European country now. We have more concerns about movements inside Sweden.
As a society, we are more into nudging: continuously reminding people to use measures, improving measures where we see day by day that they need to be adjusted. We do not need to close down everything completely because it would be counterproductive.
How does the Swedish Public Health Agency make decisions?
Around 15 people from the agency meet every morning and update decisions and recommendations according to the data collection and analysis. We talk to regional authorities twice per week.
The big debate we are facing right now is around care homes for older people, where we registered very unfortunate outbreaks of the coronavirus. This accounts for Sweden’s higher death rate, compared with our neighbours. Investigations are ongoing, because we must understand which recommendations have not been followed, and why.
We underestimated the issues at care homes, and how the measures would be applied. We should have controlled this more thoroughly. By contrast, the health system, which is under unusual pressure, has nevertheless always been ahead of the curve.
We know that COVID-19 is extremely dangerous for very old people, which is of course bad. But looking at pandemics, there are much worse scenarios than this one.
CHAPTER 4. Isolation and Quarantine vs. Herd Immunity.
mRNA vaccine technology
As soon as the severity of the lockdown, quarantine and asocial distancing corona-measures were deployed, a lot of pharmaceutical industries as well as research groups of all kind (private and governmental) started to investigate the development of a vaccine in which the hope was sold to be able to return to our normal lives.
It was to be expected from the very beginning that there would be lobbying for certain vaccines by certain shareholder groups. Indeed, the fact that the covid-19 vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna were the first to be approved speaks for itself. Both pharmaceutical concerns are mainly controlled by the same share holders1 such as the Vanguard group, Blackrock Inc., State Street Corporation and Geode Capital Management.
Moreover, the vaccines from both Pfizer and Moderna are based on completely new mRNA technology. Classic vaccines do contain parts of the virus protein capsid to which the body raises antibodies that should recognize the virus when it enters the body.
The mRNA vaccines have another mode of action: a part of the genetic code of the virus -that encodes for certain of those capsid proteins- is injected. The mRNA enters in the cell and the latter will use this mRNA template to assemble these viral capsid proteins, to which also antibodies can be generated.
The possibility mRNA vaccine technology2 is not new as such, it has been studied since the early nineties, but it has always been pushed back by all kind of regulatory commissions because of the safety concerns, especially on the long term.
What if the mRNA integrates in the cell and persists there, forcing the cell to create viral proteins for the rest of your live? Can it lead to new diseases? How will the immune system be affected by this technology on the long term? Can it lead to a new kind of auto-immune diseases3?
These long-term effects are UNKNOWN YET which makes this vaccination program one of the biggest experiments in the pharmaceutical history. If the blunting corona measures already killed half of your brain, please feel free to volunteer in this gigantic clinical trial by betting the remainder of your brain hemisphere.
The corona-crisis can at least be regarded as an insurmountable opportunity to have the mRNA technology forced through all kind of boards and committees to get emergency approval for human use, the “urge” for whatever vaccine was high enough to pass the green light.
The mRNA vaccines are “Conditional marketing authorization granted4” which basically means a quick authorization to accelerate the approval with respect to the necessity for human healthcare.
Necessity knows no law, except the “follow the money”-law. The economic model behind those mRNA vaccines is quite interesting; not for you as an individual, but for the shareholders of the vaccination industry of course. Even the fact that the storage costs of this type of vaccines is much higher (since RNA molecules are quite unstable and must therefore be stored at -80°C), the general profit is huge compared to classic vaccines.
Besides RNA stabilizing agents (like PEG5 which are also a source of concern), the mRNA vaccine does contain not much more than a part of the RNA of the coronavirus. More specifically the part that is needed to build the capsid protein that binds to certain cell surface molecules in your body. Thereby the virus wall components need to be assembled using recombinant DNA techniques in cell cultures and purified therefrom.
Using a part of the mRNA directly extracted from whatever virus and amplified (also by PCR techniques), one can bypass a couple of expensive steps in the vaccination production process.
For the time being, the vaccine manufacturers claim their product is still effective against virus mutations that popped up by the end of 2020, such as the so-called British and South-African mutations.
When the virus mutates beyond the point that the current vaccines are no longer working effectively, (and they will!), mRNA vaccine manufacturers already claimed they could generate an adapted vaccine in only 6 weeks, if necessary. The amazing advantage of mRNA vaccines lies in the fact that when a mutated corona-strain pops up, it’s way much faster and easier and -most important- much cheaper to manufacture a new adapted vaccine towards the new strain; thus, enabling much more profit for the vaccination industry.
Finally, this is exactly what the vaccination industry wants: to produce each year a new type of vaccine adapted to the seasonal corona virus of that time, and this with a minimum of costs! Extreme huge profits can be made each year again! And now these vaccines are relatively cheap, but they will increase in price year after year. And people will be willing to pay for it either out of fear or because it will be necessary to regain some of our freedom (such as traveling).
To give you an idea about the profit margin: the cheaply produced mRNA vaccines do cost about 4 to 5 times less than the AstraZeneca vaccine which is produced using the classic (expensive) way6
As we’ve already predicted, more than 100 research groups are trying to develop a corona-vaccine, but only few will get final approval, and it’s more or less defined which ones.
Countries like China and Russia which are less dependent from the WHO than most western countries, will get their own vaccine but it’s doubtful if they will get approval for the US and European market.
References:
1 The History of the mRNA Vaccines – The History of Vaccines
2 mRNA Vaccines Might Prove Catastrophic in a Rushed Coronavirus Response – NewsWars
3 BioNTech Says Can Make Mutation-Beating Vaccine In 6 Weeks (ndtv.com)
6 How the top 3 COVID-19 vaccines compare, in one chart (businessinsider.com)
Behind the name of the vaccine it says:
‘Conditional marketing authorization granted.’
It is important to know what that means.
Therefore, below is the explanation of this term from the website of the European Medicine Agency (EMA).
|
CHAPTER 4. Hotel California.
MD Dan Erickson and MD Artin Massihihad had a clear view after only one month residing in Lockdowningstreet, as they spoke facts and figures in their 27 April Youtube video:
‘We keep hearing ‘following the science ‘, what is science essentially? It is the study of the natural world through experimental observation. We are studying the diseases around us, making observations, and doing testing to figure out wat is going on.
Our volumes have dropped significantly, the ICU’s are empty, our health system is at a minimal capacity.
Through the focus on covid, people with all other critical ailments chose not to come, based on fear. How we can best respond as a nation to this?
If we compare everything we have studied and put that against the rules, well, typically you quarantine the sick, we have never seen you quarantine the healthy.
Instead of a panic reaction, how should we respond according to science?
We gained a lot of data the past weeks, in our county we tested over 5000 people, we had 340 cases, or 6.5%.
For the whole of California on 26/4 we had 60 000+ cases out of 280 000 tests, or 12%. 12% would indicate that there is a widespread viral infection, similar to flu. This is our own data, not filtered by anyone.
How we should respond based on this kind of prevalence?
The initial models proved inaccurate with their millions of deaths. If we extrapolate these results to the whole population of California, we end up with 4.7million cases. 1200 deaths in California, with an estimated 4.7 million cases, gives a 0.03 % chance of dying from this ‘killer virus‘.
Does that necessitate sheltering in place, does that necessitate shutting down medical systems, does that necessitate people being out of work?
When you realize that 96% recover with no significant continuing medical issues!
We found 6.5% in our own county, California 12%, the more you test, the more positives you get. With thus the prevalence number going up, while the death figures stay the same, the % of deaths or how deadly or frightening the disease is, goes down.
Extrapolating the data is the best we can do at this point. We will never know exact and for sure, but at least this way is far more accurate than the predictive models.
New York state, 20,000 deaths out of 19 million people, gives a death rate of 0.1%.
For the USA as a whole: 890,000 cases out of 4 million tests, 19% positive, if this is a typical extrapolation, of the 328 million population that 19% is 64 million cases, similar to the flu.
In 2017 and 2018 there were 50 to 60 million people with flu, similar death rate, 43,000 deaths, always between 35 and 60,000 deaths in USA every single year, without pandemic pep talk nor lockdown.
In Spain 22% of those tested were positive, with a statistically relevant number of tests done: 900,000 tests. So, extrapolated we should have 10 million cases.
21,000 died out of 47 million, which gives you a 0.05% chance of dying. 90% recovered without hospital.
(FYI : Spain registered 28,422 deaths by July, 21th 2020, thus finally 0.068% chance of dying)
When you pop up a system of lockdown, you should compare it with a system of no lockdown. Let’s take Sweden and Norway as a case-study.
What happened in those two countries? Are they vastly different? Did Sweden have a massive outbreak, did Norway have nothing?
Sweden has 1700 deaths, out of 10 million people. Norway, 182 deaths, out of 5 million, 0.003% death 97% recovery
A little better, but is it worth it?
What has quarantine caused?
Globally, abusive cases do increase at a severe rate, like child and spouse molestation. People with no paycheck turning to alcoholism, drug abuse, experiencing anxiety, depression. Economic collapse made suicide numbers spiking. Education dropped and some of these children should play with intoxicated parents.
These are real things we see in our clinics, although you don ‘t read about it in the news, these things are spiking all over the world.
These things last a lifetime, this is not seasonal flu, this will follow these people and affect them in a negative way the rest of their life.
Now let’s compare with the flu virus:
On average we have in the USA 24,000 deaths each year. In 2017 we had 45 million cases, with 62,000 deaths. This gives you a 0.13%chance of dying of the seasonal flu, much more than covid.
So, if covid is indeed widespread but its lethality is much less than flu, why the hell are we in this police state?
We are not making political choices here; we are only raising questions that pop up following science!
We made it our life’s work to understand this stuff, our immune system is built by exposure to anti-gens, viruses and bacteria.
When you are a small child crawling on the ground, you are putting stuff in your mouth, viruses and bacteria come in, this is how the immune system develops.
When you take people kept in their house and let them disinfect the whole of their indoor surroundings, you will kill indeed most of that small guys. But our immune system is used to touching, we share bacteria, we develop an immune response daily to this stuff. When you take that away from me, sheltering in place, my immune system drops. You keep me there in place for weeks on end, and it drops even more. People are constantly washing their hands worrying about things they indeed need to survive!
Combined we have 40 years of experience in this, this is common-sense immunology!
Quarantine decreases your immune system! If you have a normal functioning immune system you need interaction to keep it running.
O.k., if someone has a reduced immune system, you hide them away, because for the moment, they can’t build it.
In the womb there is a protected environment, later an immune system has to be built through touching and immune responses, according to the specific intruders present on the place where one lives. That is why the first months a baby is very vulnerable to opportunistic infections because it has not yet the micros of the community.
People are worrying too much from the panic-invoking media which makes them exaggerate in their sheltering in place. When they come out with decreased immune system and starting trading viruses and bacteria, what is gonna happen?! Disease is gonna spike, that is not what you want to set up for a healthy society.
Why dr Fauci and other top drs worldwide say that this is 10 times deadlier than the flu? According to what? According to models that have proven pathetically wrong?
Dr Fauci and a lot of the talking heads in the media haven’t seen a patient in twenty years, ivory tower academics and reality are two different things.
Every time you have something new in the medical world, there is fear. The first thing they wanna make sure is to limit liability.
And in the beginning, these models were all we had. From December till March, there were tons of hypotheses.
If you have no data, you must give the virus time. Let it rise up, and study it.
We study coronavirus since the 70s, every year when we get the flu, it’s a new flu virus. 99% is the same, but there are different mutations, which either cause increased virulence or more likely decreased virulence.
This type was transmissible through human beings which was new.
Initially the response to shut down, although debatable because we have never done this, so why now, is acceptable.
But when numbers start flowing in, you can’t stay stubbornly with what you initially did.
We don‘t live in an ivory tower, we are confronted with patients every day, and our unfiltered nonpolitical data show we did not respond appropriately. Looking at theory and models, which is what these folks use, is very different from the way the virus presents itself throughout community’s aka reality.
We all learn every day, it is not about right or wrong, it is about looking to trends and saying hey, we don’t see what they are talking about, time to adjust the policy that crippled the economy and created a lot of domestic issues.
Why our leaders continue taking these measures then?
As a leader, you listen to the people around you. They make decisions on different timelines; this is the best move for now. But as the data moves you get a different answer. Just by looking to our data and to data from elsewhere, I start to understand the progression of the disease in this area, and everywhere.
Nobody talks about the lack of consistency here. Inconsistencies and incongruencies restraint the motivation to adapt.
Coronavirus is on plastics for three days. While we all are sheltering in place, we carry water bottles from Cosco (supermarket), and a plastic shovel from Depot. Plastic bags, gloves, have bacteria and viruses all over them, a mask you touch to take off. Those are carriers of disease and you think it is safe.
Does that make sense to you?
You mingle in those big shops, but we cannot go to work. It is ok to go to the supermarket but not to church or bar, from a microbiological immunological standpoint this does not make sense. If you gonna isolate people you need to shut this all down.
If you don’t come out, vitamin D levels go down, resulting in bad mood, depressed, less resistance. Going outside is healthy, why you can’t go to a park but to Home Depot where nobody is wearing a mask?
If you are healthy with no significant co-morbidities, and you’re not immunodeficient, you should not wear gloves or mask, as it reduces your bacterial flora.
We understand microbiology, we understand immunology and
we want strong immune systems. I don‘t wanna hide in my home developing a weak immune system and then come out and get disease.
We have worked both in an ICU during swine and bird flu. Did we shut down for those, are they much less dangerous than covid, is the flu less dangerous than covid? Let‘s look at the numbers, no it’s not, similar in prevalence and death rate.
Now that we know the facts, it is time to get back to work, develop a strong base with herd immunity building up during summer.
Not only are the death rates lower than for flu, what is interesting, nearly nobody dies from flu anymore now, or from heart disease, diabetes, stroke, overweight, now there is only covid.
I was in hundreds of autopsies before, and we always talk about co-morbidities. Covid can be only one of many reasons, their vessels were narrow, their lungs bad, covid was part of it, it was not thé reason they died folks, one of many reasons!
Same as flu, flu was the extra thing, they had a heart attack two years ago, they had a weakened body, then we did not only put flu, why now?
Now I am being pressured to add covid on the death certificate. These directives coming originally from WHO seem to want to make covid look much worse than it is.
Why would you quarantine the healthy, it does not make any sense!
You quarantine the ill. Even in biblical times they isolated the sick.
That people go without any symptoms does not matter, that is why we advocate massive testing.
There are only two means to get rid of viruses, either you kill them, or you develop herd immunity.
Quarantining the weak and ill prevents them from being killed by viruses. And for the rest of us, we develop the ability to cope with the virus.
The lockdown is not statistically relevant, so why are we doing it?!
Do you want your immune system built of do you want it not built?
The building blocks of your immune system is viruses and bacteria, end of story. There is bacteria and flora that we have to be exposed to, bacteria and viruses that are not virulent are our friends, they protect us against bad guys.
Our conclusions, do we need to shelter, business to be shut down? No!
Do we need to test them, yes, we do!
The secondary effects are a significantly more detrimental thing to society than a virus that has been proven similar in nature to the seasonal flu we have every year.
We need to put measures in place that economic shutdown like this will never happen again, and thus preventing this is a precedent. We should see that you better have a really good scientific reason when you try to shut down our constitutional rights, and not just theory.
All leaders I talked to are in agreement, waiting for the governor to lift this ban, cause the data is showing us it’s time to lift.
And if we don’t lift, we want the reason clearly communicated.
I would start slowly, open up schools, and restaurants and bars.
Now we can go to big shops, where there are probably some hundreds of people, but we can‘t have a coffee sitting there for ten minutes.
Does that make sense to you guys?! Big businesses are open, small businesses are closed, there is no science behind that, maybe there are other factors are in play, but it certainly is not science.
Let’s start opening the businesses up. Start with the food industry, fingerstick tests are just coming out, which enables self-validation. People can test when they go to work.
Eventually we treat this like we treat flu, you have it and you feel bad, stay home, let it resolve and come back.
One thing that is being televised is that we need to capture any single case of corona. No, we don’t, that is not reality.
Are we gonna keep the economy shut down for two years and vaccinate everybody? That’s an unrealistic expectation, you are going to cause financial rupture, domestic violence, suicide, rape and what are you gonna get out of it, you still will miss cases.
We worked in IR’s for 15 years, it would be nice to capture every coronavirus patient, yes, but at what cost, is that realistic and worth it?
Asymptomatic patients usually have the milder version and that tends to spread quicker than the more virulent forms.
We need to treat this like the flu, which is familiar, and eventually, this will mutate, and become les and les virulent.
All of this thrown against the backdrop of knowledge, we don‘t need a double blind clinically controlled trial to tell us if sheltering in place is legitimate and appropriate!
That is a college level and cramped understanding of microbiology.
A lot of times in medicine you have to make educated decisions with the data which you have. I can say something at a 47th floor of a penthouse, you do this and this, but if I haven’t seen a patient for 20 years, this is not realistic. ‘
Is this talk extreme gibberish from a dangerous cult? Why then censoring it on YouTube? Involved citizens asking questions is a blessing for any society. This should be encouraged, rather than prohibited. And this was only one of the many messages on all media that was put down and censored.
Committees have been established to check the social media in order to discriminate the news between facts and fakes. Although seemingly a good initiative to withdraw fake news from the internet in order to protect the people, a lot of other ‘interesting material” is also banned from the internet. The “guy” who decides what’s allowed and what must be banned from the internet, bases himself on his personal beliefs or even worse: his personal agenda.
After this temporary suspending of our Constitutional rights any of our societies needs a thorough introspection -to which all walks of life contribute- as to whether and how the possibility of repeating this in the future should be restricted.
AKA PART 1 – CHAPTER 1: Roses are brown.
Further story of George Wittenstein:
Organized resistance was practically impossible. One could not speak openly, even with close friends, never knowing whether they might not be Nazi spies or collaborators. So well organized was the control and surveillance by the party, that each city block had a party functionary assigned to spy on his neighbours.
I remember only too well an incident in a cinema: someone sitting a few rows in front of me was led away by the Gestapo. Apparently, he had made a derogatory remark to his companion about Hitler during the preceding news. Whoever had overheard him must have, as a patriotic duty, tipped off the secret police.
If you see how people out of fear betray each other now, and how without any hesitation they steal the freedom our heroes fought for we are like back in the thirties.
Sure, there were individuals, and small, local groups who were opposed to the regime, but it was nearly impossible to establish contacts, nor to maintain communications. Thus, the existing groups were small, isolated, and did not know of each other.
Students, throughout history, have been idealistic, rebellious against existing order and old empty conventions, and willing to take chances.
Most of our group had been members of youth organizations. In essence they grew out of a disillusionment of young people with the old established order. Their ideals and stated goals were personal freedom, self-imposed discipline, and strict adherence to highest moral and ethical principles.
All of us were of the same political conviction: against Hitler and the Nazi Regime. But, in a way typical for millions of Germans at the time, we withdrew into our own private sphere, in our case the arts, philosophy, our circle of friends, aptly called inner emigration. When German atrocities became known, for us this detachment gave way to the conviction that it was not good enough to keep to oneself, one’s beliefs, and ethical standards, but that the time had come to act.
Our leaflets called for a “rebirth of German student life to make the university again a living community devoted to the truth.”
And that for the sake of future generations, an example must be set after the war, so that no one will ever have the slightest desire to try anything like this ever again. Do not forget the minor scoundrels of this system; note their names, so that no one may escape…We shall not be silent – we are your bad conscience. The White Rose will not leave you in peace.
Deeply shaken, our people behold the loss of the men of Stalingrad. 330,000 German men have been senselessly and irresponsibly driven to their deaths and destruction by the ingenious strategy of the WWI private. Führer, we thank you.
Do we want to sacrifice the remainder of our German youth to the base ambitions of a Party clique? No, never!
We demand the return of personal freedom, the most precious treasure of the Germans which cunningly has been cheated from us. We have grown up under a government which deprived us ruthlessly of free speech and forcibly anesthetized us in a fog of empty phrases, our budding ability to think and judge for ourselves.
CHAPTER 1 Coronazi Germ-many
CHAPTER 1
Coronazi Germ-many
Coronazi Germ many quotes
Claude Bernard had some rather fantastic insights, wow, here are some quotes from him:
The terrain is everything, the germ is nothing.
A discovery is generally an unforeseen relation not included in theory
True science teaches us to doubt and, in ignorance, to refrain.
We must never make experiments to confirm our ideas, but simply to control them.
It is better to know nothing than to keep in mind fixed ideas based on theories whose confirmation we constantly seek, neglecting meanwhile everything that fails to agree with them.
We must alter theory to adapt it to nature, but not nature to adapt it to theory.
The doubter is a true man of science, he doubts only himself and his interpretations, but he believes in science.
It is what we know already that often prevents us from learning.
When we meet a fact which contradicts a prevailing theory, we must accept the fact and abandon the theory, even when the theory is supported by great names and generally accepted.
Men who have excessive faith in their theories or ideas are not only ill- prepared for making discoveries, they also make very poor observations.
Of necessity, they observe with a preconceived idea, and when they devise an experiment, they can see in its results only a confirmation of their theory. In this way they distort observation and often neglect very important facts because they do not further their aim.
When entering on new ground we must not be afraid to express even risky ideas so as to stimulate research in all directions. We must not remain inactive through false modesty based on fear of being mistaken.
Mediocre men often have the most acquired knowledge.
Progress is achieved by exchanging our theories for new ones which go further than the old, until we find one based on a larger number of facts. Theories are only hypotheses, verified by more or less numerous facts. Those verified by the most facts are the best, but even then they are never final, never to be absolutely believed.
A great discovery is a fact whose appearance in science gives rise to shining ideas, whose light dispels many obscurities and shows us new paths.
Proof that a given condition always precedes or accompanies a phenomenon does not warrant concluding with certainty that a given condition is the immediate cause of that phenomenon. It must still be established that when this condition is removed, the phenomenon will no longer appear.
Men who believe too firmly in their theories, do not believe enough in the theories of others. So … these despisers of their fellows … make experiments only to destroy a theory, instead of to seek the truth.
Men who have excessive faith in their theories … make poor observations, because they choose among the results of their experiments only what suits their object, neglecting whatever is unrelated to it and carefully setting aside everything which might tend toward the idea they wish to combat.
Particular facts are never scientific, only generalization can establish science.
Observation is a passive science, experimentation is an active science.
The great experimental principle, then, is doubt, that philosophic doubt which leaves to the mind its freedom and initiative, and from which the virtues most valuable to investigators in physiology and medicine are derived.
Also Louis Pasteur had some bright moments, alas, his many followers were too busy looking for micro-organisms to hear him coming to senses:
To know how to wonder and question is the first step of the mind towards discovery.
The role of the infinitely small in nature is infinitely great.
One does not ask of one who suffers: what is your country and what is your religion.
The greatest derangement of the mind is to believe in something because one wishes it to be so.
Bernard was right, the germ is nothing, the terrain is everything.
It is not the germs we need to worry about, it is our inner terrain.
Inspiration is the impact of a fact on a well-prepared mind.
Posterity will one day laugh at the sublime foolishness of the modern materialistic philosophy.
Where observation is concerned chance only favours the prepared mind.
The greatest malfunction of spirit is to believe things.
Worship the spirit of criticism.
The Greeks bequeathed to us one of the most beautiful words in our language, the word ‘enthusiasm’ -en theos- a god within. The grandeur of human actions is measured by the inspiration from which they spring. Happy is he who bears a god within, and who obeys it.
If it is a terrifying thought that life is at the mercy of the multiplication of these minute micro-bodies, it is a consoling hope that science will not always remain powerless before such enemies.
Preconceived ideas are like searchlights which illumine the path of the experimenter and serve him as a guide to interrogate nature. They become a danger only if he transforms them into fixed ideas. This is why I should like to see these profound words inscribed on the threshold of all the temples of science: ‘The greatest derangement of the mind is to believe in something because one wishes it to be so.’
When you believe you have found an important scientific fact, and are feverishly curious to publish it, constrain yourself for days, weeks, years sometimes, fight yourself, try and ruin your own experiments, and only proclaim your discovery after having exhausted all contrary hypotheses. But when, after so many efforts you have at last arrived at a certainty, your joy is one of the greatest which can be felt by a human soul.
Imagination should give wings to our thoughts but we always need decisive experimental proof, and when the moment comes to draw conclusions and to interpret the gathered observations, imagination must be checked and documented by the factual results of the experiment.
Science proceeds by successive answers to questions more and more subtle, coming nearer and nearer to the very essence of phenomena.
To bring one’s self to believe in a truth that has just dawned upon one is the first step towards progress; to persuade others is the second.
Pathogens are only harmful in a terrain that allows them so. If the terrain could be stable so that pathogens could not create chaos, pathogens were irrelevant.
Herrmann Pidoux and Armand Trousseau stated:
‘Disease exists within us, because of us, and through us’.
Pasteur did not entirely disagree: ‘This is true for certain diseases’, he wrote cautiously, only to add immediately: ‘I do not think that it is true for all of them’.
Virchow
He was a German that -like Pasteur- believed the greater part of his life in ‘the-bad-guys’ microbes. Later he recognized:
Pathogens search for their habitat, sick cells, like mosquitos look for still water, in both cases not being the cause.
There can be no scientific dispute with respect to faith, for science and faith exclude one another.
First, it must be a pleasure to study the human body, the most miraculous masterpiece of nature, and to learn about the smallest vessel and the smallest fibre. But second and most important, the medical profession gives the opportunity to alleviate the troubles of the body, to ease the pain, to console a person who is in distress, and to lighten the hour of death of many a sufferer.
Only those who regard healing as the ultimate goal of their efforts can, therefore, be designated as physicians.
Medical education does not exist to provide students with a way of making a living, but to ensure the health of the community.
AirCorona Insights:
Your terrain, the ecosystem of the body, is the first line of defence, only when it fails due to bad condition, the Body Resistance (BR) charges.
This shows the importance of keeping a healthy internal environment and a BR in good shape.
Being busy with pathogens is pathetic, yet, this is the whole starting point in our medicine, where patients are not told anything about keeping their terrain balanced.
Other than the Pasteur view on only bad bacteria, the insight grows that pro-biotica form a crucial part of a strong enhanced immunity.
As is alkalinity as a general condition.
Western medicine clings to false premises, an incorrect insight in the nature of microbes, with as a consequence millions of preventable deaths.
Most people are suffering the combination of the lack of wisdom of their MD’s and of their trust in them and in SQ that gives them their undeserved status.
MAKE-YOURSELF-AWARE GUIDE TO SEE THROUGH BLURRED TRUTHS
DO-IT-YOURSELF GUIDE TO THRIVE DURING TROUBLED TIMES.